Title image

Anti-islamic feeling on the rise

The WaPo reports:

[A] poll found that nearly half of Americans -- 46 percent -- have a negative view of Islam, seven percentage points higher than in the tense months after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, when Muslims were often targeted for violence.
At the risk of turning into DailyKos - well, duh! I think most people were and are smart enough to separate islam from Al Queda, just as most people are smart enough not to see Fred Phelps as being representative of Christianity. People understood that islam was not responsible for 9/11, and they very properly conflated it with terrorists, not muslims. But in the last couple of months, a very large number of muslims have taken to the streets to demonstrate how closed-minded, intolerant and frankly gullible they are, in light of some frankly not-that-offensive cartoons in a minor newspaper in a small European country; is it really that much of a shock that this has negatively affected people's opinion?

Now, one of the first calls I made on September 11th was to an acquaintance from Lebanon, because my immediate thought was "oh crap, this is going to get pinned on muslims and islam." For the most part, it turned out that I was wrong: most people exercised good sense, and realized that the vast majority, practically the entirety, of muslims joined with everyone else in saying "this was a monstrous act by a few nut jobs." And likewise, I think people are smart enough to see the insurgency for what it is, a bunch of power-hungry proto-fascists who aren't so much attempting to create an islamic republic as they are trying to put themselves at the head of it. But "cartoongate" is an entirely different matter: it is an apparently sizable and popular series of protests against a core American liberty, free speech. We are seeing a large number of muslims basically protesting against the very freedom they are exercising by protesting. Frankly, I would be lying if I said my impression of them as a group hadn't suffered, if for no reason better than the seeming incapacity of these folks to see what dupes their leaders are playing them for. As Judge Kozinski once put it, the parties are advised to chill.

Comments

Comment by Maryland Conservatarian:
I posted a similar "duh!!" comment over at my spot. My question on the cartoons has always been: If they're not allowed to produce caricatures or likeness's of the Prophet, what was their basis for recognizing the cartoons as of the Prophet.

Congrats on the TO quote. If it were me, that'd be a reason to issue and mass mail a special edition of my resume.
Timestamp: 3/9/2006 5:11:00 PM | Cite as: #1

Leave a comment:

Name:
Your Email address:

Keep my email address hidden
Your website / blog:
http://
Comments:

Spam protection:

If you're a human being rather than a spam robot, type "I am a human" in this box.

Recent entries
» Moving on up
» New Dream Theater
» Federalist Society Student Symposium
» The Guy Pratt website
» Rudy 2008?
» Christmas kitty pics
» Musical stuff: Walking on Air and Unicron's Theme
» OCILLA, ISPs and Contributory Infringement
» The Misguided Search for "the One Law - and the Ongoing Struggle to Articulate it Correctly"
» Voting representation for DC

Text-only version for PDAs and screen readers
Translate this site
The Federalist Society
GOP E-Corps
Get Firefox
Search the archives
Archives
May 2007
April 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
November 2002

Categories
Abortion
Blogs and blogging
Bureau of Motor Vehicles
Cat blogging
ConLaw
Default
Diane%20Sykes
Elections: 2006
Federalism
Feminism
Foreign policy: Iraq
Foreign policy: North Korea
Immigration
Internet
Kelo v. New London
Legal misc
Legal theory
Music
Newt Gingrich
Noise2signal
Politics
Russia
Scalia
Sciences
Supreme Court
The Nuclear Option

Blogroll
» Expressio Unius
» ACS blog
» Adam Yoshida
» AlaskaBlawg
» Alone in Public
» Andrew Sullivan
» Ann Althouse
» Appellate Law & Practice
» CenterFields
» Charging Rino
» Concurring Opinions
» Denise Howell
» Election Law Blog
» Emminent Domain
» Ex Post
» GOP Bloggers
» GrokLaw
» How Appealing
» Indiana Law Blog
» Instapundit
» Intellectual Conservative
» Is That Legal?
» Joel on Software
» Law & Letters
» Legal Miscellania
» Legal Theory Blog
» Little Miss Atilla
» Maryland Conservatarian
» May it Please the Court
» My Vast Right-wing Conspiracy
» National Center
» NinoMania
» Objective Justice
» Olympia Snowe 2008 blog
» Orin Kerr
» Paul Gowder
» PrawfsBlawg
» Purr Se
» ScienceBlog
» SCOTUS Briefs
» SCOTUSblog
» Siberian Light
» Sonic Frog Blog
» Starbucks Republican
» Sundries
» Talking Points Memo
» Tax Foundation Blog
» The Green Bag
» The Moderate Voice
» The Raw Story
» The Volokh Conspiracy
» Tim Roll Pickering
» Underneath their Robes
» Unlearned Hand
» Unused And Probably Unusable
» What Now?
» Yale FedSoc

Powered by Noise 2 Signal 2.0 Valid CSS!